Ford Recalls The 2013 Escape For Seventh Time

One of Ford Motor Company's most popular vehicles may also be one of its most troubled.

The company announced two more recalls Tuesday of its 2013 Ford Escape for problems that have caused at least 13 engine fires. The recalls affect 149,386 vehicles.

In documents filed with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Ford officials said a "misinstalled fuel line could chafe and eventually leak fuel."

It's the latest in a string of problems for the '13 Escape, which has now been recalled seven times in roughly 17 months on the market. Ford said it knew of no deaths or injuries associated with the latest problem, but among 117 complaints filed on the car, several motorists told NHTSA they were afraid to drive their vehicles.

"The auto stalls randomly on occasion. I feel this is a dangerous situation, however, the dealer can't get a code so Ford will not fix," one vehicle owner wrote.

"We are concerned that we may get rear ended in a serious accident if the car stalls again, and the car/truck behind us doesn't stop in time, e.g. Harry Chapin on the LIE (Long Island Expressway)," wrote another. "We transport our two grandchildren two days a week from school and are extremely concerned."

The latest report of an engine fire arrived on Nov. 18, when a motorist wrote, "my car is still overheating after bringing it into the dealer 6 times."

NHTSA does not release the names of vehicle owners who file complaints.

The problems with fuel leaking, overheating and potential fires in the Escape is a vexing one for Ford. The company had issued three previous recalls to deal with the same problems on July 18, 2012, Sept. 4, 2012 and Dec. 3, 2012. It was not immediately clear why the first wave of recalls did not resolve the problem, and Ford did not return messages left seeking comment Tuesday.

The Escape remains a popular small SUV. Through October, Ford has sold 250,543 Escapes so far this year, trailing only the Honda CR-V in the crossover segment.

Among its crossover competitors, however, the Escape is the dubious leader among recalls by a wide margin for vehicles in the 2013 model year. The '13 CR-V has been recalled once. The Chevy Equinox, Toyota RAV4, Mazda CX-5 and Subaru Forester have not been recalled.

___________________________________________
Source: Aol Autos (Bigelow, 11/27)

Alcohol involved in fatal crash

The driver in a fatal car accident that killed three Sam Houston State University students last month had a blood alcohol content level more than twice the legal limit in Texas, autopsy and toxicology reports show.

The Houstonian student newspaper first reported on Thursday results from the autopsy conducted by Montgomery County Forensic Services.

Bianca Espinal, 19, was the driver in the Dec. 14 accident at the intersection of Bowers Boulevard and Avenue I on the SHSU campus. Espinal, Eric Torres, 22, and Alfonso Mata, 20, all died at the scene.

Espinal, according to the autopsy, had a blood alcohol level of .21g/100mL, and 2.0 ng/mL of tetrahydrocannabinol, the primary psychoactive found in marijuana.

University Police Sgt. Ronald Cleere told the Item on Thursday that investigators are still waiting for an advanced reconstruction report that would give them a more accurate idea of how fast the vehicle was traveling at the time of the incident.

The Texas Department of Transportation crash report shows the 2006 Chevrolet Impala traveled northbound in the 2000 block of Avenue I “at a high rate of speed” when the front left tire struck the traffic island on the north side of the intersection at Bowers Boulevard.

The vehicle crossed into the landscaped area on the east end of Academic Building 4, struck a light post and handrail before going airborne.

“It’s the ultimate consequence to pay for consuming alcohol and driving,” Cleere said. “The ultimate bad outcome of this is death and it happened to students at this university. It’s really sad.”

Torres, according to the crash report, was partially ejected through the sun roof.

The Houstonian also reported SHSU officials admitting fault to misidentifying Roberto Rodriguez Guerra as one of the three students who died in the crash. UPD Chief Kevin Morris said the department made a mistake after identifying a piece of property that belonged to Guerra found on Mata.

Guerra told police that it was his iPod, which contained a copy of his class schedule and student ID, that police mistook for the victim’s identification.

There was one lone survivor, 23-year-old Thomas Roling, who the crash report indicates extracted himself from the vehicle and waited for emergency responders before being treated at Huntsville Memorial Hospital.

Police were dispatched to the accident shortly before 5 a.m., Saturday Dec. 14, just hours before SHSU held commencement ceremonies at Johnson Coliseum, a block away from the deadly scene.

ADAI makes effort to prevent similar incidents.

SHSU Alcohol and Drug Abuse Initiative Coordinator Edward Gisemba said even before the crash, the ADAI looked into relaunching a designated driver incentive program. Gisemba said the program, which faded years ago, saw positive reviews initially, but had poor marketing.

ADAI is reaching out to local bars to get them to hang banners outside their businesses to promote responsible drinking.

“Obviously it’s a tragedy that has hit many of the people in Student Services very hard, myself especially because this is the very thing I’m trying to prevent,” Gisemba said. “What we’re trying to do to the best of our ability is look forward and try to determine how to avoid this from ever happening again. And we’ll do that on a number of fronts.”

Gisemba said in discussions with colleagues at SHSU, there’s talk of something similar to the Texas A&M carpooling system that runs Thursday through Saturday, taking students home from bars.
But Gisemba also mentioned the importance of empowering bystanders and peers to effectively deter friends from drinking and driving.

“Even more so than a program to promote safety and responsibility, we need to be able to show students how important it is to prevent one another from drinking and driving,” Gisemba said. “We can have a program with certain hours of operation, but ultimately people might drink and need to get home at a time that’s not within that window. We want them to make the responsible decision.”



Source: The Huntsville Item, "Alcohol involved in fatal crash," Brandon K. Scott, January 17, 2014

Texas family petitions for upgraded 911 systems after hotel death

ALBANY, GA- Last month an East Texas family suffered the loss of a young mother, Kari Hunt Dunn. She was stabbed multiple times in a hotel room where she was staying with her family, her 9 year old daughter tried calling 911 for help but couldn't get through. She tried several times but heard nothing but static, she had no idea she had to dial a prefix before making the call from the hotel phone.

"We spend a lot of time doing that and we know 911 and young children just typically know 911 and they expect to hear a voice on the other end," Albany-Dougherty Emergency Management Agency representative Jim Vault said.

That's why the Hunt family is striving to get support for an online petition that would require every single hotel and business to upgrade their 911 systems and get rid of the dial out number. So far, over 400,000 people are have signed for the change called "Kari's Law," in honor of the mother's life who was lost.

"It impacts a larger number across the nation and again with any public safety time is essence," Albany-Dougherty EMS Training Supervisor Richard Roberts shares. "It can make the big difference whether it's EMS, law or fire."

Vault explains, "If they have to dial a prefix to get out then it can become confusing and time delaying and they never get the call through."

In the Albany-Dougherty area, the enhanced 911 system is in place, it gives location and number to which the caller is calling from and the prefix is also not a requirement. However, some cities and their businesses still require the dial out before. Emergency officials feel it's an important issue that sometimes falls under the radar.

"For us it would be much better if 911 means 911," Vault said.

The Hunt family hopes the requirement will help those in need get help faster.

_____________________________________________
Source: WALB (Rosales, 1/13)

Texas Court Holds Employer Not Liable for Employee’s Death Due to Driving While Intoxicated

A Texas state appeals court has ruled employers are not required to protect their intoxicated employees from injury or death, provided the employer played no role in the employee’s intoxication.  Clark v. EOG Resources Inc., 12-CV-00262 (Tex. App. Houston 1st Dist. Jan. 7, 2014).

Robbie Lynn Clark, an employee of a contractor for EOG Resources, Inc., was killed in a fatal car crash while driving a Company truck back to work after his lunch break.  Toxicology reports indicated Clark was intoxicated, with a blood alcohol reading of over 4 times the legal limit.   Following the accident, Clark’s family sued EOG for negligence and wrongful death, claiming EOG failed to enforce its policy prohibiting drinking while on the job and negligently failed to investigate whether Clark had a history of driving while intoxicated before allowing him to drive a Company vehicle.

Clark, who had a long history of driving while intoxicated, was hired by a contractor for EOG two weeks after he was released from prison for his fourth DWI conviction.  He submitted a driving record report with his application, but the report (which was labeled as “for insurance purposes only”) only included three years of driving history.  As Clark’s most recent DWI conviction was 6 years earlier, it did not show up on the report.

Six months after he began working with EOG, Clark was arrested again for driving while intoxicated and his license was suspended.  Clark failed to report the conviction to EOG, however, and continued to drive without a license.  He died ten months later.

The lawsuit alleged EOG had a duty to closely scrutinize Clark’s employment history before allowing him to drive a Company vehicle.  Had EOG done so, according to Clark’s family, it might have discovered  in Clark’s employment as a result of serving prison sentences for his DWI convictions.  The suit further alleged that EOG failed to adequately enforce its own policy prohibiting drinking on the job.

The trial court dismissed the case on a motion for summary judgment.  It found EOG did not have any control over Clark’s decision to drink and drive.  The appeals court affirmed.  Though the court recognized that Texas case law has found employers can be liable, under certain circumstances, to third parties injured in a car crash by an intoxicated employee, it found no such liability existed here.  Absent a showing that EOG knowingly exerted control over an intoxicated Clark or encouraged or required him to consume alcohol while at work, as an employer it did not “owe a duty to prevent [an] employee from injuring himself through his own intoxicated driving of a company vehicle during a lunch break.”

Source: National Law Review, "Texas Court Holds Employer Not Liable for Employee’s Death Due to Driving While Intoxicated," Kathryn J. Barry, January 12, 2014

Laser Hair Removal’s Risks

Her first two laser hair-removal sessions went smoothly, but the third ended with burning pain that persisted for weeks, a 26-year-old Brooklyn woman recalled. Then the marks appeared: long red stripes along the backs of her legs. Over the next few months, the stripes turned dark brown.

“It was horrifying,” said the woman, who asked not to be identified in order to preserve her privacy. “It wasn't something you would see on a normal person.”
Laser hair-removal procedures have become immensely popular in recent years. Nearly half a million such treatments were performed by dermatologic surgeons in 2011, the last year for which figures are available, according to the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery. But an unknown number of procedures are performed each year by nonphysicians who may have minimal training.

The treatments are not without risk. Performed improperly, they can cause disfiguring injuries and severe burns in sensitive areas, like the bikini line and the mustache area above the lips, and, rarely, even death.
The percentage of lawsuits over laser surgery that involved a nonphysician operator rose to 78 percent in 2011 from 36 percent in 2008, according to a study published in JAMA Dermatology in October. Laser hair removal was the most commonly performed procedure cited in the litigation. Another popular treatment, intense pulse light, is used to “rejuvenate” aging skin and get rid of wrinkles.

“Not a week goes by that I don’t see a complication from a laser,” said Dr. Tina Alster, founding director of the Washington Institute of Dermatologic Laser Surgery. She and other physicians worry about the proliferation of non-medical facilities like so-called medical spas that offer laser treatments and other cosmetic treatments but may not have licensed medical personnel on site.

“There’s a perception by the public that anybody can do this,” Dr. Alster said. “People need to remember, it’s not the laser doing the work, it’s the operator.”

In the case of the Brooklyn woman, the laser operator, who was not a doctor, scheduled repeat treatments of her legs four weeks apart instead of the 10 to 12 weeks for legs and the back recommended in a treatment protocol, according to her lawyer, Harry Rothenberg. She sued and reached a confidential settlement with the laser operator.

The licensing and training of laser hair-removal operators varies from state to state, resulting in a patchwork of rules and regulations, said Dr. Mathew M. Avram, director of the Massachusetts General Hospital Dermatology Laser and Cosmetic Center and an author of the new study.

In laser hair removal, pulses of light are used to destroy hair follicles. The treatment is considered to be the practice of medicine in some 35 states; however, nonmedical personnel who offer the treatment are required to have on-site medical supervision in only 26 states.

New York, Virginia and Georgia do not consider laser hair removal to be a medical treatment, and 11 states simply don’t have laws regulating it.

“It’s basically the Wild West of medicine,” Dr. Avram said. “Some states are legislating and protecting patients, but a great many are not. The average person walks into a spa and sees someone with a white coat on and may assume they’re a physician.”

Even doctor-owned facilities may not have one on the premises when procedures are being done, Dr. Avram said. And states that require medical supervision may not require training and licensing of laser operators; training often is left up to the manufacturers that sell the laser equipment.
But the operator makes critical assessments of an individual’s skin type and how far apart to schedule treatments, as well as other decisions. Among those with the greatest risk of complications are people with more natural pigment in their skin or those who are tan.

A laser operator with no medical training also may treat something that looks like a sun spot but is actually a skin cancer, obscuring the disease until it is much more advanced, Dr. Avram said.
Allan Share, president of the International Medical Spa Association, agrees that there is very little oversight of medical and day spas, and he urges consumers to do research before seeking treatment. “It’s always important for a consumer to do their own due diligence,” he said.

For those considering laser hair removal, here are some factors to consider:
Ask whether the facility is owned by a medical doctor and whether he or she is immediately available during procedures.

• Ask the provider to review your medical history.
• Ask what procedures are in place in case of an emergency.
• Ask who will actually perform the procedure.
• What licensing and training does the operator have?
• How many times has the operator performed laser hair removal?
• Has he or she done it on the part of the body that you want treated?
• Ask whether laser treatment is appropriate for your skin type, hair color, complexion and body area.

Suggest that the operator test a small patch of skin before you undergo the procedure. Consumers with conditions like diabetes, a difficulty with wound healing, or a tendency toward keloid scarring may be especially vulnerable to complications and should talk to a doctor before undergoing laser treatment.
If you experience pain or discoloration after a procedure, don’t wait — call your doctor right away.

Source: KDH News, "Copperas Cove girl dies in pedestrian-vehicle accident," Mason W. Canales, January 7, 2014